Thu 14 Jan 2010
Freedom of speech vs respect for religions
Posted by Christer under English posts, published, religion
1 Comment

One of the more insidious Danish Muhammed cartoons, by Kurt Westergaard (hosted at Religiousfreaks.com)
After the recent attacks on Kurt Westergaard, one of the Danish cartoonists that drew the infamous Muhammed cartoons, the debate about the limits of freedom of speech, blasphemy and religions has resurfaced again. Norwegian daily Aftenposten reprinted a facsimile of the cartoons, and was promptly condemned by Iranian and Pakistani politicians. I don’t know if I can add much to the debate, but these are my two cents.
Firstly, many of the drawings are rather vulgar and stupid. (And the coming cartoon in Fremskrittspartiet’s magazine will probably be no better.) I enjoy poking fun at religions as much as the next guy, and there are many hilarious aspects about islam as well, but I generally had problems laughing at these drawings. They didn’t provide a surprising take on the connections between radical islam and terrorism or oppression of women, and to some extent they provide more of a window on Danish prejudices and quasi-racism, than on islamist oppression.
Secondly, the outrage at the drawings is also vulgar and stupid. For instance, the Iranian Holocaust competition provided some drawings that carry a very strong subtext of Holocaust denial (see below).
And then you have all the horrible demonstrations and violent actions that followed in the wake of the publications. Such as the recent flagburning in Pakistan (VG, Dagbladet). Now, authoritarian politicans are once again trying to capitalize on the renewed publication of the drawings.

Yes, isn’t caricatures supposed to be funny? Perhaps if they knew that the cartoons would become so famous they would have made a better job out of drawing them. Or perhaps not.
And while the outrage over the cartoons is indeed vulgar and stupid, sometimes the outrage over the outrage is as well.